Robinson v. City of East Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Robinson v. City of East Providence

617 A.2d 1375, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 25, 1993 WL 18347

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 22, 1993

DocketNo. 91-657-Appeal

StatusPublished

This text of 617 A.2d 1375 (Robinson v. City of East Providence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. City of East Providence, 617 A.2d 1375, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 25, 1993 WL 18347 (R.I. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The defendants, the city of East Providence and the former mayor of said city in his official capacity appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court which awarded Ann M. Robinson damages in the amount of $36,462.20 including interest for a violation of her civil rights as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and further protected by 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 1985. Counsel for the parties came before this court January 19, 1993 for oral argument pursuant to an order which had directed the defendants to appear in order to show cause why their appeal should not be summarily denied and dismissed.

After hearing the oral argument and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown.

The trial justice found that the former mayor of East Providence had denied reappointment to the plaintiff as a police constable for political reasons after she had failed to support him in an election for the office of City Council. The trial justice also held the city liable for terminating the plaintiff’s position as a police matron, after she had served in that capacity from April of 1983 until February 1985. The plaintiff was never given a notice of a hearing prior to her removal from the position of police matron. We are of the opinion that the case of Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62, 110 S.Ct. 2729, 111 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990) is controlling. In that case a majority of the Supreme Court determined that one might not be deprived of employment by reason of discharge, failure [1376]*1376to recall, promote, or failure to hire for purely political reasons. In this case the refusal to reappoint the plaintiff or to continue her employment as a police matron constituted a violation of her First Amendment rights.

The appeal of the defendants is denied and dismissed. The judgment entered by the Superior Court is hereby affirmed.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The defendants, the city of East Providence and the former mayor of said city in his official capacity appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court which awarded Ann M. Robinson damages in the amount of $36,462.20 including interest for a violation of her civil rights as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and further protected by 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 1985. Counsel for the parties came before this court January 19, 1993 for oral argument pursuant to an order which had directed the defendants to appear in order to show cause why their appeal should not be summarily denied and dismissed.

After hearing the oral argument and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown.

The trial justice found that the former mayor of East Providence had denied reappointment to the plaintiff as a police constable for political reasons after she had failed to support him in an election for the office of City Council. The trial justice also held the city liable for terminating the plaintiff’s position as a police matron, after she had served in that capacity from April of 1983 until February 1985. The plaintiff was never given a notice of a hearing prior to her removal from the position of police matron. We are of the opinion that the case of Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62, 110 S.Ct. 2729, 111 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990) is controlling. In that case a majority of the Supreme Court determined that one might not be deprived of employment by reason of discharge, failure [1376]*1376to recall, promote, or failure to hire for purely political reasons. In this case the refusal to reappoint the plaintiff or to continue her employment as a police matron constituted a violation of her First Amendment rights.

The appeal of the defendants is denied and dismissed. The judgment entered by the Superior Court is hereby affirmed.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 A.2d 1375, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 25, 1993 WL 18347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-city-of-east-providence-ri-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack