Robinson v. Ceppos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Ceppos

41 A.D.2d 849, 343 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4722

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 849 (Robinson v. Ceppos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Ceppos, 41 A.D.2d 849, 343 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 20,1972, which, upon confirmation of the award, is in favor of petitioner against appellants in a stated amount of money. Judgment reversed insofar as it is against appellants Kenneth S. Ceppos, Robert Ceppos and Daniel Ceppos, on the law, without costs, and application denied as to said appellants; and judgment affirmed insofar as it is against appellant Kenbert Lighting Industries, Inc., without costs. Insofar as the arbitrator’s award provided for its payment by the individual appellants, the arbitrator acted with respect to a matter not submitted to him (CPLR 7511, subd. [e], par. 2). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 20,1972, which, upon confirmation of the award, is in favor of petitioner against appellants in a stated amount of money. Judgment reversed insofar as it is against appellants Kenneth S. Ceppos, Robert Ceppos and Daniel Ceppos, on the law, without costs, and application denied as to said appellants; and judgment affirmed insofar as it is against appellant Kenbert Lighting Industries, Inc., without costs. Insofar as the arbitrator’s award provided for its payment by the individual appellants, the arbitrator acted with respect to a matter not submitted to him (CPLR 7511, subd. [e], par. 2). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 849, 343 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-ceppos-nyappdiv-1973.