Robinson v. Carmichael

68 S.E. 582, 134 Ga. 654, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 306
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 23, 1910·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The injunction should have been granted. The ease differs

from that of Ayer v. James, 120 Ga. 578 (48 S. E. 154), and the cases therein cited, all being from courts where the dockets were not so crowded as were those of the city court of Atlanta, and where the practice óf assignment of cases was not the same. It was more, like the case of Howell v. Ware & Harper, 133 Ga. 674 (66 S. E. 884), where a proceeding, to set aside a judgment rendered by default in the city court of Atlanta, on the ground that the sudden illness of counsel had prevented him from filing a defense until the time for filing defenses had was held not io be demurrable.

Judgment re versed.

All the Justices concur. Moore & Branch, for plaintiff. Lowndes Calhoun, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Carmichael, 68 S.E. 582, 134 Ga. 654, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 306 (Ga. 1910).

68 S.E. 582 (Robinson v. Carmichael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blanch v. King
44 S.E.2d 779 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Pratt v. Rosa Jarmulowsky Co.
170 S.E. 365 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Sherman v. Stephens
118 S.E. 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Cannon v. John B. Daniel Inc.
113 S.E. 186 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Clark v. Ramsey
75 S.E. 1128 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Byrd Printing Co. v. Whitaker Paper Co.
70 S.E. 798 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Sims v. Sims
69 S.E. 545 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)