Robinson v. Cain

Opinion

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 21 1998 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk

BETESTIA ROBINSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

JUDY CAIN, The Oklahoma State No. 98-7000 Employment Commission; KATHY (D.C. No. 97-CV-472-BU) HARRIS, the Department of Human (Eastern District of Oklahoma) Resource; KARLA TURLEY, Travelers Express Company,

Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. Betestia Robinson appeals the dismissal on statute of limitations and procedural

grounds of her purported civil rights complaint. Our examination of the briefs and the

record indicates the district court did not err. The judgment is AFFIRMED for the

reasons stated by the district court in its order of dismissal dated December 3, 1997.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge

-2-