Robinson v. Byrne

278 A.D. 783, 104 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4732
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment enjoining him from interfering with gas pipes, electric light and telephone wires running across defendant’s premises and serving plaintiffs’ premises, and further granting judgment to plaintiffs for $678.68 damages for wrongful breaking of a water pipe which crossed defendant’s property. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. At the time of the conveyance by Campbell to Almon on December 1, 1945, there were" no water pipes, gas mains, electric or telephone wires serving any part of the premises now owned by plaintiffs. These easements were not necessary for the reasonable use of that part of the property granted at that time which is now owned by plaintiffs and, therefore, may not be implied. Plaintiffs Tufts in the companion action may not subject defendant’s property to servitude or use in connection with the premises of plaintiffs Robinson in the present action. {McCullough v. Broad Fxch. Co., 101 App. Div. 566, 572, affd. 184 N. Y. 592.) (See Tufts v. Byrne, post, p. 783, decided simultaneously herewith.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Byrne, 278 A.D. 783, 104 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 783 (Robinson v. Byrne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foti v. Noftsier
72 A.D.3d 1605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Kuczek v. Arpino
65 Misc. 2d 935 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)