Robinson v. Busic

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Robinson v. Busic

150 S.E.2d 774, 268 N.C. 449, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1227

DecidedNovember 2, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E.2d 774 (Robinson v. Busic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Busic, 150 S.E.2d 774, 268 N.C. 449, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1227 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant took many exceptions to the admissibility of evidence and to designated parts of the court’s charge, none of which is sustained. The rule for the assessment of damages given by the court, while not technically correct, nevertheless was in nowise prejudicial to the defendant. There is nothing in this record to suggest the defendant would fare better, and he might fare worse at another trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant took many exceptions to the admissibility of evidence and to designated parts of the court’s charge, none of which is sustained. The rule for the assessment of damages given by the court, while not technically correct, nevertheless was in nowise prejudicial to the defendant. There is nothing in this record to suggest the defendant would fare better, and he might fare worse at another trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E.2d 774, 268 N.C. 449, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-busic-nc-1966.