Robinson v. Burge

71 Ga. 526
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 71 Ga. 526 (Robinson v. Burge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Burge, 71 Ga. 526 (Ga. 1884).

Opinion

Blandeord, Justice.

1. The controlling question in this case is, whether land sold under a justice’s court execution, upon which there was no entry of “ no personal property to be found,” transfers and conveys the title to the purchaser.

The uniform decisions of this court, commencing with Hopkins vs. Burch, 3 Kelly, 222, down to the present time, have been, even under the act of 1811, that there must be an entry of “ no personal property to be found,” before the constable is authorized to-make the levy upon land. This principle, decided so early as 1847, has been incorporated in the Code of Georgia, and now forms a part of the statute law of this state. Code, §4172 (b).

So it must follow that a deed of conveyance, made by a sheriff under a justice’s court fi. fa., of land, upon which there was no entry of no personal property to be found on said execution, is void, and conveys no title.

2. It has been repeatedly held by this court, that the officer making the levy could make the entry nunc pro tunc, of no personal property to be found. If the officer has gone out of office, then it is too late to have the entry made, and it cannot be done. Code, §3645, 3948; 68 Ga., 585. But the plaintiff's in the present case made no effort, [528]*528and did not seek to have this entry of the constable corrected, as the law authorized.

The plaintiffs having rested their case upon a deed made by the sheriff, under a sale made by virtue of a justice’s court execution, upon which there was no entry of no personal property to be found,” the court was right to award a non-suit in this case, and his judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peterson v. General Shoe Corp.
153 S.E.2d 637 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Burden v. Gates
3 S.E.2d 679 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Delaware County Trust Co. v. Goldberg
25 Pa. D. & C. 123 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Dorminey v. DeLang
130 Ga. 618 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 Ga. 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-burge-ga-1884.