Robinson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.

S.D. Alabama

Robinson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.

DecidedMarch 7, 2025

Docket1:23-cv-00274

StatusUnknown

This text of Robinson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. (Robinson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., (S.D. Ala. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHERRI ROBINSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-00274-KD-MU ) BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION ) INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER This action is before the Court on the Rule 41(a) Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. 37). The stipulation indicates that Plaintiff Sherri Robinson is “appearing through undersigned counsel” because she died in May 2024. Pursuant to Alabama law, counsel’s representation of Robinson terminated at her death. Est. of Jones v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 829 So. 2d 170, 171 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002) (“In addition, ‘an attorney's authority to act on behalf of a client ceases on the death of that client.’”) (citations omitted); Billingsley v. City of Gadsden, 295 So. 3d 670, 672 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019) (same). Therefore, Robinson cannot appear through counsel to stipulate to dismissal of this action. Accordingly, the stipulation is MOOT. The parties are reminded that Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) provides as follows: If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.

Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 25(a)(1).

DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of March 2025. s/Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHERRI ROBINSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-00274-KD-MU ) BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION ) INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER This action is before the Court on the Rule 41(a) Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. 37). The stipulation indicates that Plaintiff Sherri Robinson is “appearing through undersigned counsel” because she died in May 2024. Pursuant to Alabama law, counsel’s representation of Robinson terminated at her death. Est. of Jones v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 829 So. 2d 170, 171 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002) (“In addition, ‘an attorney's authority to act on behalf of a client ceases on the death of that client.’”) (citations omitted); Billingsley v. City of Gadsden, 295 So. 3d 670, 672 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019) (same). Therefore, Robinson cannot appear through counsel to stipulate to dismissal of this action. Accordingly, the stipulation is MOOT. The parties are reminded that Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) provides as follows: If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.

Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 25(a)(1).

DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of March 2025. s/Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Robinson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-bp-exploration-production-inc-alsd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack