Robinson v. Bennett

49 A.D.3d 652, 852 N.Y.2d 805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2008·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual determination to be resolved by the Family Court (see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d 842, 843 [2007]; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d 675 [2005]; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d 629 [2004]). The Family Court’s credibility determination is entitled to great weight on appeal (see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d at 843; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d at 675; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d at 629). The record supports the Family Court’s determination that the petitioner failed to prove, by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence, that the respondent committed an act constituting a family offense (see Family Ct Act § 832; Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d at 842-843; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d at 675; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d at 629). Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Bennett, 49 A.D.3d 652, 852 N.Y.2d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 652 (Robinson v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howell v. Howell
105 A.D.3d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Akter v. Patwary
80 A.D.3d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Delano v. Desimone
60 A.D.3d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Fleming v. Fleming
52 A.D.3d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)