Robinson v. Bender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Bender

21 A.D.2d 932, 251 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3368

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 932 (Robinson v. Bender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Bender, 21 A.D.2d 932, 251 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant admits a meretricious relationship with the respondent and the only issue is the time of occurrence. The Judge of the Family Court did not write a decision but he participated actively in the interrogation of the respondent and it is implicit in the order appealed from that he found the evidence met the standard required in filiation proceedings. We see no reason to disturb the determination. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant admits a meretricious relationship with the respondent and the only issue is the time of occurrence. The Judge of the Family Court did not write a decision but he participated actively in the interrogation of the respondent and it is implicit in the order appealed from that he found the evidence met the standard required in filiation proceedings. We see no reason to disturb the determination. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 932, 251 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-bender-nyappdiv-1964.