Robinson v. Bax

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Robinson v. Bax

247 S.W.2d 88

DecidedMarch 7, 1952

StatusPublished

This text of 247 S.W.2d 88 (Robinson v. Bax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Bax, 247 S.W.2d 88 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

COMBS', Justice. '

This appeal is from a judgment denying the petition for, a writ of habeas corpus. Criminal Code of Practice, 429-1. At the time the petition was filed petitioner was confined, in, the Jefferson County jail. The Commonwealth has filed motion to dismiss, the appeal, supported by certified statement pf the clerk of the court that the petitioner is now at liberty under bond to appear for trial.

It is elementary that the writ of habeas corpus is appropriate only in those cases where there is an actual or physical, restraint of the person. The rule is stated in 14 A.L.R. 344: "It is well settled that a person out on hail is not so restrained of his liberty as to be entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. An actual or physical restraint is required in order that such a writ may issue.”

Also see Ex parte Ford, 160 Cal. 334, 116 P. 757, 35 L.R.A.,N.S., 882; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U.S. 245, 33 S.Ct. 240, 57 L.Ed. 497; Ex parte Powell, 191 Wash. 152, 70 P.2d 778.

The appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COMBS', Justice. '

This appeal is from a judgment denying the petition for, a writ of habeas corpus. Criminal Code of Practice, 429-1. At the time the petition was filed petitioner was confined, in, the Jefferson County jail. The Commonwealth has filed motion to dismiss, the appeal, supported by certified statement pf the clerk of the court that the petitioner is now at liberty under bond to appear for trial.

It is elementary that the writ of habeas corpus is appropriate only in those cases where there is an actual or physical, restraint of the person. The rule is stated in 14 A.L.R. 344: "It is well settled that a person out on hail is not so restrained of his liberty as to be entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. An actual or physical restraint is required in order that such a writ may issue.”

Also see Ex parte Ford, 160 Cal. 334, 116 P. 757, 35 L.R.A.,N.S., 882; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U.S. 245, 33 S.Ct. 240, 57 L.Ed. 497; Ex parte Powell, 191 Wash. 152, 70 P.2d 778.

The appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W.2d 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-bax-kyctapp-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack