Robinson v. Bassett
This text of 34 F. App'x 957 (Robinson v. Bassett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mark Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because the dismissal was without prejudice, Robinson may refile his complaint alleging sufficient facts to state a claim for § 1983 relief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). We dispense with [958]*958oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 F. App'x 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-bassett-ca4-2002.