Robinson v. Bacon

111 S.E. 579, 28 Ga. App. 423, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 563
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 1, 1922·No. 12791·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Upon this writ of error, by which it is sought to review a judgment of the superior court, sustaining a certiorari from a verdict and judgment in a justice’s court, the judge certifies that he “ sustained the certiorari generally and not upon any • particular ground.” The evidence did not demand the verdict rendered in the justice’s court, but would have amply authorized a verdict for the petitioner in certiorari. This being the only question involved, and the order sustaining the certiorari having the effect of a first grant of new trial, it will not be disturbed. Walker v. Hughes, 120 Ga. 1079 (48 S. E. 387); Maner v. Clark-Stewart Co., 27 Ga. App. 553 (109 S. E. 178).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur. Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Strange presiding. July 7, 1921. J. T. Grice, D. L. Stanfield, for plaintiffs in error. C. L. Cowart, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Bacon, 111 S.E. 579, 28 Ga. App. 423, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 563 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 579 (Robinson v. Bacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker & Walker v. Hughes
48 S.E. 387 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Maner v. Clark-Stewart Co.
109 S.E. 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)