Robinson v. Arkansas State Hospital

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided January 6, 2022·No. 4:21-cv-00865·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

REGINALD DEAN ROBINSON PLAINTIFF

No. 4:21-cv-865-DPM

ARKANSAS STATE HOSPITAL; KEITH SCOGGINS, CEO, Arkansas State Hospital; STEVEN DOMON, Director of the Facility, Arkansas State Hospital; and MARTIN AULT, Registered Nurse, Arkansas State Hospital DEFENDANTS

ORDER Robinson has amended his complaint. Doc. 5. The Court must screen it, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), to determine whether the amended complaint cures the pleading problems that the Court identified in his original complaint. Doc. 4. It does not. The Court warned Robinson that, in order to succeed on any individual capacity failure-to-protect claim against front-line staff, he must name them and state specifically what each failed to do. Doc. 4 at 2. Robinson again says was sexually assaulted and he told staff after the fact, but he does not say who he told. Instead, he simply says Ault was the “CN in charge and responsible for the unit staff.” Doc. 5 at 5. Ault may have supervised the unit staff but, absent pleaded facts showing that Ault knew about a pervasive risk of harm and failed to respond reasonably to that risk,

Ault is immune from suit. Vandevender v. Sass, 970 F.3d 972, 977 (8th Cir. 2020). The same is true for both Scoggins and Domon who are immune from suit for any constitutional violations of their employees unless pleaded facts demonstrate that they either directly participated in the violation or tacitly participated in the violation by failing to supervise or train their employees. Barton v. Tabor, 908 F.3d 1119, 1125 (8th Cir. 2018). Without such a showing, which Robinson does not make, no supervisor liability exists. Tlamka v. Serrell, 244 F.3d 628, 635 (8th Cir. 2001). Again, Robinson’s official capacity claims and claims against the Hospital fail as a matter of law, Doc. 4. Robinson’s individual capacity claims are factually unsupported and do not demonstrate supervisory liability. His amended complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered. TP loll D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge & famvony Apa.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Arkansas State Hospital, (E.D. Ark. 2022).

Robinson v. Arkansas State Hospital (Robinson v. Arkansas State Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tlamka v. Serrell
244 F.3d 628 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Regina Barton v. Chad Ledbetter
908 F.3d 1119 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
James Vandevender v. Captain Walter Sass
970 F.3d 972 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)