Robinson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

176 A.D.2d 1215, 578 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13891

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1991·Published

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in concluding that plaintiff failed to show that "special circumstances” existed to warrant additional disclosure from defendant’s medical expert (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]; Siegel, NY Prac § 348A [2d ed 1991]; cf., Rosario v General Motors Corp., 148 AD2d 108; Brandes v Pettibone, Inc., 62 AD2d 1133). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — Quash Subpoena.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in concluding that plaintiff failed to show that "special circumstances” existed to warrant additional disclosure from defendant’s medical expert (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]; Siegel, NY Prac § 348A [2d ed 1991]; cf., Rosario v General Motors Corp., 148 AD2d 108; Brandes v Pettibone, Inc., 62 AD2d 1133). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — Quash Subpoena.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Robinson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 176 A.D.2d 1215, 578 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

176 A.D.2d 1215 (Robinson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related