Robinson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

176 A.D.2d 1215, 578 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13891

This text of 176 A.D.2d 1215 (Robinson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 176 A.D.2d 1215, 578 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in concluding that plaintiff failed to show that "special circumstances” existed to warrant additional disclosure from defendant’s medical expert (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]; Siegel, NY Prac § 348A [2d ed 1991]; cf., Rosario v General Motors Corp., 148 AD2d 108; Brandes v Pettibone, Inc., 62 AD2d 1133). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — Quash Subpoena.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brandes v. Pettibone, Inc.
62 A.D.2d 1133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Rosario v. General Motors Corp.
148 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D.2d 1215, 578 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-aetna-life-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1991.