ROBINSON, LINDA L. v. STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

ROBINSON, LINDA L. v. STATE OF NEW YORK

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 2013

DocketCA 12-01440

StatusPublished

This text of ROBINSON, LINDA L. v. STATE OF NEW YORK (ROBINSON, LINDA L. v. STATE OF NEW YORK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ROBINSON, LINDA L. v. STATE OF NEW YORK, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 143 CA 12-01440 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

LINDA L. ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER, ORLEANS MEN’S CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND PATRICIA TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ACADEMIC EDUCATION SUPERVISOR, ORLEANS MEN’S CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

EMMELYN LOGAN-BALDWIN, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

CHRISTINA A. AGOLA, PLLC, ROCHESTER (STEVEN E. LAPRADE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered October 28, 2011. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to compel the production of the medical records of defendant Patricia Townsend.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that, during the course of her employment as a teacher at defendant Orleans Men’s Correctional Facility, she was subjected to unlawful discrimination based upon sex, age and disability, and to retaliation for complaining about such discrimination. Patricia Townsend (defendant) was plaintiff’s supervisor at the correctional facility. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion seeking, inter alia, to compel production of defendant’s medical records. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant waived the physician-patient privilege with respect to those records by disclosing them in an action commenced by defendant in federal court (see Scinta v Van Coevering, 284 AD2d 1000, 1001), we conclude that plaintiff failed to meet her initial burden of making an evidentiary showing that defendant’s medical condition is “in controversy” in this action (CPLR 3121 [a]; see Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278, 287-288; Scinta, 284 AD2d at 1001). The fact that defendant affirmatively placed her medical condition in controversy in the related action she commenced in federal court does not relieve plaintiff of her initial -2- 143 CA 12-01440

burden herein.

Entered: February 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 143 CA 12-01440 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

LINDA L. ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER, ORLEANS MEN’S CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND PATRICIA TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ACADEMIC EDUCATION SUPERVISOR, ORLEANS MEN’S CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

EMMELYN LOGAN-BALDWIN, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

CHRISTINA A. AGOLA, PLLC, ROCHESTER (STEVEN E. LAPRADE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered October 28, 2011. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to compel the production of the medical records of defendant Patricia Townsend.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that, during the course of her employment as a teacher at defendant Orleans Men’s Correctional Facility, she was subjected to unlawful discrimination based upon sex, age and disability, and to retaliation for complaining about such discrimination. Patricia Townsend (defendant) was plaintiff’s supervisor at the correctional facility. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion seeking, inter alia, to compel production of defendant’s medical records. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant waived the physician-patient privilege with respect to those records by disclosing them in an action commenced by defendant in federal court (see Scinta v Van Coevering, 284 AD2d 1000, 1001), we conclude that plaintiff failed to meet her initial burden of making an evidentiary showing that defendant’s medical condition is “in controversy” in this action (CPLR 3121 [a]; see Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278, 287-288; Scinta, 284 AD2d at 1001). The fact that defendant affirmatively placed her medical condition in controversy in the related action she commenced in federal court does not relieve plaintiff of her initial -2- 143 CA 12-01440

burden herein.

Entered: February 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

ROBINSON, LINDA L. v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-linda-l-v-state-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack