Robinson Bros. & Co. v. Tygart Steel Products Co.

184 F.2d 534
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 1950
DocketNo. 10,132
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 F.2d 534 (Robinson Bros. & Co. v. Tygart Steel Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson Bros. & Co. v. Tygart Steel Products Co., 184 F.2d 534 (3d Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case plaintiff brought claim against two defendants in the alternative. One defendant pleaded a counterclaim, which the Court, on motion, purported to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. There is doubt whether there is any judgment of record. Since the counterclaim was less than all of the claims involved in the action and there was no “express determination that there is no< just reason for delay,” and there is no “express direction for the entry of judgment,”' no final judgment has been entered under the terms of Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Etten v. Kauffman, 3 Cir., 179 F.2d 302.

The appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Company
224 F.2d 198 (Second Circuit, 1955)
Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
224 F.2d 198 (Second Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 F.2d 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-bros-co-v-tygart-steel-products-co-ca3-1950.