Robinson-Bey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Robinson-Bey v. State

331 S.W.3d 351, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 134, 2011 WL 533547

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 2011·No. No. ED 94222·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allen Robinson-Bey appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. Robinson-Bey argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of trial counsel. We find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allen Robinson-Bey appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. Robinson-Bey argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of trial counsel. We find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Robinson-Bey v. State, 331 S.W.3d 351, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 134, 2011 WL 533547 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

331 S.W.3d 351 (Robinson-Bey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.