Robins v. Gould

New York Supreme Court

Robins v. Gould

1 Abb. N. Cas. 133

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Abb. N. Cas. 133 (Robins v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robins v. Gould, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 133 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Barrett, J.

I have no doubt that this case was an extraordinary and difficult one within the meaning of the Code. If the issues were at all similar to those in Taylor against the same defendant (tried before me two months since), the questions of law and fact were delicate and complicated. It certainly was not an ordinary action for breach of contract. The plaintiff, on the proofs contained in Mr. Shearman’s affidavit, is fairly entitled to a moderate allowance, and I think that, considering the amount involved, and the labor and expense stated, $500 would be but reasonable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrett, J.

I have no doubt that this case was an extraordinary and difficult one within the meaning of the Code. If the issues were at all similar to those in Taylor against the same defendant (tried before me two months since), the questions of law and fact were delicate and complicated. It certainly was not an ordinary action for breach of contract. The plaintiff, on the proofs contained in Mr. Shearman’s affidavit, is fairly entitled to a moderate allowance, and I think that, considering the amount involved, and the labor and expense stated, $500 would be but reasonable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Abb. N. Cas. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robins-v-gould-nysupct-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack