Robins v. Gould

1 Abb. N. Cas. 133
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Barrett, J.

I have no doubt that this case was an extraordinary and difficult one within the meaning of the Code. If the issues were at all similar to those in Taylor against the same defendant (tried before me two months since), the questions of law and fact were delicate and complicated. It certainly was not an ordinary action for breach of contract. The plaintiff, on the proofs contained in Mr. Shearman’s affidavit, is fairly entitled to a moderate allowance, and I think that, considering the amount involved, and the labor and expense stated, $500 would be but reasonable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robins v. Gould, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 133 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

1 Abb. N. Cas. 133 (Robins v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weiss v. Morrell
28 N.Y.S. 61 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
People ex rel. Morgan v. Board of Supervisors
15 N.Y.S. 580 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Ehlers v. Willis
63 How. Pr. 341 (New York Marine Court, 1882)