Robinette v. Middletown
This text of 2020 Ohio 1427 (Robinette v. Middletown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Robinette v. Middletown, 2020-Ohio-1427.]
MIKE ROBINETTE Case No. 2019-01096PQ
Requester Judge Patrick M. McGrath
v. JUDGMENT ENTRY
CITY OF MIDDLETOWN
Respondent {¶1} On February 24, 2020, a special master recommended dismissal of requester Mike Robinette’s complaint after the special master determined that Robinette failed to comply with court orders and failed to prosecute his claim. The parties were given an opportunity to respond to the special master’s recommendation to dismiss. Neither party has filed a response to the special master’s recommendation. {¶2} The court finds the special master’s recommendation is well-taken. Upon the recommendation of the special master and in accordance with R.C. 2743.75(D)(2), the court sua sponte DISMISSES Robinette’s complaint without prejudice. Court costs are assessed against Robinette. The court directs the clerk to serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
PATRICK M. MCGRATH Judge
Filed March 25, 2020 Sent to S.C. Reporter 4/10/20
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 Ohio 1427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinette-v-middletown-ohioctcl-2020.