Robinett v. Roundhouse

166 N.W.2d 6, 15 Mich. App. 27, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 777
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1968·No. Docket No. 4,536·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves a sale by plaintiff to defendants of a parcel of land, on which plaintiff operated a “fish out” trout pond business, together with the pertinent equipment. A dispute arose as to the effective date of the sale. Plaintiff filed a complaint asking for rescission of the contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim asking for an accounting. After trial on the merits, the court denied rescission and rendered a judgment on the accounting. Defendants received less than they thought they should in the accounting, and appeal.

[28] Upon de novo examination of the briefs and record we reach the same conclusions as did the trial judge.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

R. B. Burns, P. J., and J. H. Gmnis and Cobkin, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinett v. Roundhouse, 166 N.W.2d 6, 15 Mich. App. 27, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 777 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

166 N.W.2d 6 (Robinett v. Roundhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.