Robinett v. Roundhouse

Michigan Court of Appeals

Robinett v. Roundhouse

166 N.W.2d 6, 15 Mich. App. 27, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 777

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 1968

DocketDocket No. 4,536

StatusPublished

This text of 166 N.W.2d 6 (Robinett v. Roundhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinett v. Roundhouse, 166 N.W.2d 6, 15 Mich. App. 27, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 777 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves a sale by plaintiff to defendants of a parcel of land, on which plaintiff operated a “fish out” trout pond business, together with the pertinent equipment. A dispute arose as to the effective date of the sale. Plaintiff filed a complaint asking for rescission of the contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim asking for an accounting. After trial on the merits, the court denied rescission and rendered a judgment on the accounting. Defendants received less than they thought they should in the accounting, and appeal.

[28]*28Upon de novo examination of the briefs and record we reach the same conclusions as did the trial judge.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

R. B. Burns, P. J., and J. H. Gmnis and Cobkin, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case involves a sale by plaintiff to defendants of a parcel of land, on which plaintiff operated a “fish out” trout pond business, together with the pertinent equipment. A dispute arose as to the effective date of the sale. Plaintiff filed a complaint asking for rescission of the contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim asking for an accounting. After trial on the merits, the court denied rescission and rendered a judgment on the accounting. Defendants received less than they thought they should in the accounting, and appeal.

[28]*28Upon de novo examination of the briefs and record we reach the same conclusions as did the trial judge.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

R. B. Burns, P. J., and J. H. Gmnis and Cobkin, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 N.W.2d 6, 15 Mich. App. 27, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinett-v-roundhouse-michctapp-1968.