Robine v. Carleton Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robine v. Carleton Co.

239 A.D. 833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 A.D. 833 (Robine v. Carleton Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robine v. Carleton Co., 239 A.D. 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

On argument, order granting reargument and on reargument denying plaintiff’s motion [834]*834for a preference affirmed, without costs. Rule 6 of the Kings County Trial Term Rules does not contemplate a class of cases in which are sought damages for personal injuries, although the causes of action therefor are based nominally on contract. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Pursuant to the provisions of rule 1 of the Rules of Civil Practice, Frank H. Innes, Esq., residing at 94 Clinton avenue, New Brighton, in the county of Richmond, is hereby appointed a member of the committee on character and fitness of applicants for admission to the bar in and for the Second Judicial District, in place of Francis F. Leman, deceased, to serve on such committee during the pleasure of the court; such appointment to take effect May 3, 1933, Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On argument, order granting reargument and on reargument denying plaintiff’s motion [834]*834for a preference affirmed, without costs. Rule 6 of the Kings County Trial Term Rules does not contemplate a class of cases in which are sought damages for personal injuries, although the causes of action therefor are based nominally on contract. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Pursuant to the provisions of rule 1 of the Rules of Civil Practice, Frank H. Innes, Esq., residing at 94 Clinton avenue, New Brighton, in the county of Richmond, is hereby appointed a member of the committee on character and fitness of applicants for admission to the bar in and for the Second Judicial District, in place of Francis F. Leman, deceased, to serve on such committee during the pleasure of the court; such appointment to take effect May 3, 1933, Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D. 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robine-v-carleton-co-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack