Robin Mobile Home Parks, Inc. v. Willett

2024 Ohio 5651
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 2, 2024
Docket2024-P-0063
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2024 Ohio 5651 (Robin Mobile Home Parks, Inc. v. Willett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robin Mobile Home Parks, Inc. v. Willett, 2024 Ohio 5651 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

[Cite as Robin Mobile Home Parks, Inc. v. Willett, 2024-Ohio-5651.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY

ROBIN MOBILE HOME PARKS, INC., CASE NO. 2024-P-0063

Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Municipal Court, Ravenna Division

MICHAEL WILLETT, Trial Court No. 2024 CVG 01176 R Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Decided: December 2, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Michael A. Noble, Lentz, Noble & Heavner, LLC, 228 West Main Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Michael Willett, pro se, 3218 State Route 82, No. 151, Mantua, OH 44255 (Defendant- Appellant).

JOHN J. EKLUND, J.

{¶1} On October 11, 2024, appellant, Michael Willett, filed a pro se appeal from

a September 4, 2024 entry. Appellee, Robin Mobile Home Parks, Inc., through counsel,

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely. Appellant filed no opposition.

{¶2} App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing

a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has

held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 2008-Ohio-6810, ¶ 17, citing State ex rel.

Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988).

{¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal

from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.

3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of

courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the

judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the

time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted on the appearance

docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 2005-Ohio-5260.

{¶4} In this case, the trial court issued its entry on September 4, 2024. The clerk

of courts noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry under Civ.R. 58(B) was

issued to the parties on September 5, 2024. Therefore, pursuant Civ.R. 58(B), the time

to appeal began to run from September 4, 2024. The deadline for appellant to file his

notice of appeal was October 4, 2024, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus,

appellant’s October 11, 2024 notice of appeal was untimely filed by 7 days.

{¶5} This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.

Pendell at 60; see also App.R. 14(B).

{¶6} Based upon the foregoing, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted.

This appeal is dismissed pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).

EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.,

ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,

concur. 2

Case No. 2024-P-0063

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rives v. Lowes
2025 Ohio 4530 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
Smirnova v. Flannery & Georgalis, L.L.C.
2025 Ohio 3033 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
Edwards v. Jeziorkowski
2025 Ohio 2740 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
Groves-Campbell v. Waytes
2025 Ohio 805 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ohio 5651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robin-mobile-home-parks-inc-v-willett-ohioctapp-2024.