Robin Hood Inn Co. v. State

18 Misc. 2d 530, 191 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2966
CourtNew York Court of Claims
DecidedSeptember 28, 1959
DocketClaim No. 34545
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Misc. 2d 530 (Robin Hood Inn Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robin Hood Inn Co. v. State, 18 Misc. 2d 530, 191 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2966 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).

Opinion

Alexander Del G-iorno, J.

This is a motion for an order amending the findings of fact and conclusions of law and/or making new findings and conclusions and rendering a new decision increasing the award to claimant, upon all of the grounds specified in section 549 of the Civil Practice Act except excessiveness of damages.

After trial, the court marked findings of fact and conclusions of law and in addition made new findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In essence, the motion is based upon dissatisfaction upon the part of claimant with the amount awarded by the court after trial. No valid ground for granting the motion has. been presented. •

The remedy of claimant is by appeal for a review of the decision of the court. (MacKenzie v. State of New York, 7 Misc 2d 396.)

The motion is denied. Settle order on five days’ notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacKenzie v. State
7 Misc. 2d 396 (New York State Court of Claims, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Misc. 2d 530, 191 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robin-hood-inn-co-v-state-nyclaimsct-1959.