Robin Brooks v. Michael Brooks

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 6, 2023
DocketA23D0354
StatusPublished

This text of Robin Brooks v. Michael Brooks (Robin Brooks v. Michael Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robin Brooks v. Michael Brooks, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 06, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23D0354. ROBIN BROOKS v. MICHAEL BROOKS. A23D0355. ROBIN BROOKS v. MICHAEL BROOKS.

Robin Brooks has filed applications for discretionary review from two trial court orders entered in separate civil cases. In Case No. A23D0354, Brooks seeks to appeal the trial court’s order modifying child support and awarding attorney fees to her ex-husband’s attorney. In Case No. A23D0355, Brooks seeks to appeal the trial court’s order dismissing her case seeking the termination of her ex-husband’s parental rights to their minor chid. The trial court in both cases entered its orders on April 28, 2023, and Brooks filed both applications in this Court on June 7, 2023. In both cases, we lack jurisdiction. To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order, decision, or judgment sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). See In the Interest of B. R. F., 299 Ga. 294, 298 (788 SE2d 416) (2016) (holding that an appellate court lacks jurisdiction over an untimely application for discretionary appeal); Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Georgia, 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021) (compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional, and failure to comply with that procedure requires dismissal of the appeal). Because Brooks filed her applications 40 days after the entry of the orders she seeks to appeal, they are untimely. Accordingly, these applications are hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/06/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of B. R. F., a Child
788 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robin Brooks v. Michael Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robin-brooks-v-michael-brooks-gactapp-2023.