Robidoux v. Rosengren

638 F.3d 1177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robidoux v. Rosengren. Read the opinion of the Court — 638 F.3d 1177
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2011·No. 09-16674·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

JESSE ROBIDOUX; et al., No. 09-16674

Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 2:06-cv-02334-LKK-

DAD

v. Eastern District of California, Sacramento

BRIAN ROSENGREN; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees. ORDER

Before: NOONAN, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The mandate issued on February 14, 2011 was issued in error. The mandate

is recalled. The request for publication filed on January 28, 2011 is GRANTED.

The memorandum disposition filed on January 21, 2011 is WITHDRAWN. A

superseding opinion will be filed in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 2011).

638 F.3d 1177 (Robidoux v. Rosengren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.