Robeson v. Miller

4 Colo. App. 313
Colorado Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1894·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Suit for balance due for wages by Robeson against Miller. Judgment for plaintiff for $50.00. Plaintiff comes here by writ of error. The principal witnesses were the parties. Both agree that plaintiff worked ten months at $25.00 per month. They disagree as to payments. Defendant says he paid plaintiff $174.65; and plaintiff says he only received $133.50. Ten months’ labor at $25.00 per month amounts to $250.00. If plaintiff’s figures were correct, he was entitled to judgment [314]*314for $116.50. If defendant was more worthy of belief, plaintiff was entitled to judgment for $75.35. The court gave judgment for $50.00. Plow it found this sum, or why it rendered such a judgment, we are unable .to guess. If the plaintiff was right the judgment was wrong; if the defendant was right the judgment was wrong; and being wrong upon any hypothesis, it must be reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robeson v. Miller, 4 Colo. App. 313 (Colo. Ct. App. 1894).

4 Colo. App. 313 (Robeson v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmer v. Gleason
389 P.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1964)
Thompson v. Davis
184 P.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1947)
Holbrook Irrigation District v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.
269 P. 574 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1928)
Galligan v. Luther
54 Colo. 118 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1912)
Burlington Interurban Railway Co. v. Chapman
53 Colo. 28 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1912)
Ferrari v. Brooks-Harrison Fuel Co.
53 Colo. 259 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1912)
Schon-Klingstein Meat & Grocery Co. v. Snow
43 Colo. 538 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)
Smyth v. Lynch
7 Colo. App. 383 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1896)