Robertucci v. Heier

299 A.D.2d 404, 749 N.Y.S.2d 430

This text of 299 A.D.2d 404 (Robertucci v. Heier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertucci v. Heier, 299 A.D.2d 404, 749 N.Y.S.2d 430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered November 19, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiff failed to comply with court-ordered discovery demands, and the plaintiff’s counsel failed to appear for a court-ordered conference (see Montgomery v City of New York, 296 AD2d 386; Dacey v Horror Cafe, 293 AD2d 511). S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dacey v. Horror Cafe, Inc.
293 A.D.2d 511 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Montgomery v. City of New York
296 A.D.2d 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 A.D.2d 404, 749 N.Y.S.2d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertucci-v-heier-nyappdiv-2002.