Robertson v. Wells

28 Miss. 90
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 Miss. 90 (Robertson v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson v. Wells, 28 Miss. 90 (Mich. 1854).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fisher

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in the circuit court of Calhoun county, founded upon the note of the defendant below to the plaintiff.

The facts are as follows : One Williamson and the defendant Robertson, had a dispute as to what sum should be paid to Williamson, on account of a breach of a certain contract on the part of Robertson. The plaintiff below and one Pass were selected as arbitrators, and agreed between themselves that Robertson should pay Williamson $19 per month from the 1st of January till some time in May following, when Williamson quit the employment of Robertson. In computing the time, the arbitrators made a mistake, computing it as six months, whereas it was only four months and some days.

The question is whether this mistake ought to be corrected. To this question there can be but one answer, and that is, whether the proof is clear that the mistake was made. Pass, [92]*92the only witness who was really disinterested on the trial below, proves the facts as above stated.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hutto v. Jordan
36 So. 2d 809 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Miss. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-wells-miss-1854.