Robertson v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Robertson v. United States

675 F. App'x 337

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2017·No. No. 16-2123·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to reopen his prior Chapter 7 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-01109-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to reopen his prior Chapter 7 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-01109-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Robertson v. United States, 675 F. App'x 337 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 337 (Robertson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.