Robertson v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Robertson v. United States

590 F. App'x 273

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2015·No. No. 14-1883·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his complaint challenging certain tax collection activities by the Internal Revenue Service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-02553-WDQ, 2014 WL 3797367 (D.Md. July 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his complaint challenging certain tax collection activities by the Internal Revenue Service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-02553-WDQ, 2014 WL 3797367 (D.Md. July 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Robertson v. United States, 590 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

590 F. App'x 273 (Robertson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.