Robertson v. Union Electric Co.
Opinion
William Robertson (Appellant) appeals from an order dismissing his petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal is dismissed.
This Court has an obligation to determine sua sponte whether it has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, and if we lack jurisdiction, we should dismiss the appeal. Bryant v. City of University City, [86]*86105 S.W.3d 855, 856 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). In a civil case, a judgment must be expressly denominated “judgment” or “decree” to be appealable. Rule 74.01(a); Williams v. Imperial Homes, Inc., 169 S.W.3d 554, 555 (Mo.App.E.D.2005. E.D.1997). In designating the writing a “judgment,” it must be clear from the writing that the trial court is calling the document or docket sheet entry a judgment. City of St. Louis v. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d 850, 853 (Mo. banc 1997).
Here, the order granting the Respondents’ motion to dismiss and dismissing Appellant’s appeal without prejudice is not denominated a judgment.1 We issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed and providing Appellant an opportunity to ask the circuit court to enter a judgment that complied with Rule 74.01(a). Appellant has failed to respond to our order and has not filed a judgment complying with Rule 74.01(a).
We dismiss the appeal without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
201 S.W.3d 85 (Robertson v. Union Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.