Robertson v. State

26 S.W. 508, 33 Tex. Crim. 366, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 116
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 16, 1894·No. No. 469.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DAYIDSON, Judge.

The State relied solely for conviction upon defendant’s being seen in possession of a pistol stolen from the burglarized house. He was seen with it the morning after the burglary, and about 9:30 o’clock. He testified that he spent the night at West Station, some miles distant from the scene of the crime, and came there on the train, and purchased the pistol from a young negro about 8 o’ clock the same morning. The case was one depending solely upon circumstantial evidence to support the conviction. The court omitted a charge applicable to this state of case, and appellant duly reserved his exceptions. The omission is fatal to the conviction. Hpon another trial, the law in relation to alibi should also be given in charge to the jury.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robertson v. State, 26 S.W. 508, 33 Tex. Crim. 366, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 116 (Tex. 1894).

26 S.W. 508 (Robertson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
58 S.W.2d 1023 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Hancock v. State
57 S.W.2d 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Skirlock v. State
284 S.W. 545 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)