Robertson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Robertson v. State

1924 OK CR 237, 228 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 114, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 9, 1924

DocketNo. A-4599.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 237 (Robertson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. State, 1924 OK CR 237, 228 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 114, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Robertson, was convicted on a charge that he did exhibit to various persons an indecent picture of a nude woman, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $10 and the costs. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 16, 1923, a petition in error, with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made in behalf of plaintiff in error. The' Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. This appeal has evidently been abandoned. An examination of the record proper discloses no prejudicial error. The judgment herein is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Robertson, was convicted on a charge that he did exhibit to various persons an indecent picture of a nude woman, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $10 and the costs. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 16, 1923, a petition in error, with case-made. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made in behalf of plaintiff in error. The' Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. This appeal has evidently been abandoned. An examination of the record proper discloses no prejudicial error. The judgment herein is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 237, 228 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 114, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.