Robertson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Robertson v. State

457 A.2d 826, 295 Md. 688, 1983 Md. LEXIS 223

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedApril 5, 1983

Docket[No. 99, September Term, 1982.]

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 457 A.2d 826 (Robertson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. State, 457 A.2d 826, 295 Md. 688, 1983 Md. LEXIS 223 (Md. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether the Criminal Court of Baltimore committed reversible error when it declined to instruct the jury that it was bound by the trial court’s instructions that the burden was upon the State to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court of Special Appeals in an unreported opinion concluded that the issue had not been preserved for *689 appellate review and affirmed the defendant’s convictions. We think the issue was properly preserved. The defendant’s counsel made clear to the trial judge that even though the jury was the judge of the law under Article 23 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, he was entitled to an instruction that the court’s comments on the burden of proof were not merely advisory but were binding upon the jury. Failure to give the requested instruction constituted reversible error. See Stevenson v. State, 289 Md. 167, 423 A.2d 558 (1980); Montgomery v. State, 292 Md. 84, 437 A.2d 654 (1981); Davis v. State, 48 Md. App. 474, 427 A.2d 1085 (1981).

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals reversed; case remanded to that Court with instructions to remand the case to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for a new trial; costs to be paid by the State of Maryland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether the Criminal Court of Baltimore committed reversible error when it declined to instruct the jury that it was bound by the trial court’s instructions that the burden was upon the State to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court of Special Appeals in an unreported opinion concluded that the issue had not been preserved for *689 appellate review and affirmed the defendant’s convictions. We think the issue was properly preserved. The defendant’s counsel made clear to the trial judge that even though the jury was the judge of the law under Article 23 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, he was entitled to an instruction that the court’s comments on the burden of proof were not merely advisory but were binding upon the jury. Failure to give the requested instruction constituted reversible error. See Stevenson v. State, 289 Md. 167, 423 A.2d 558 (1980); Montgomery v. State, 292 Md. 84, 437 A.2d 654 (1981); Davis v. State, 48 Md. App. 474, 427 A.2d 1085 (1981).

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals reversed; case remanded to that Court with instructions to remand the case to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for a new trial; costs to be paid by the State of Maryland.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

457 A.2d 826, 295 Md. 688, 1983 Md. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-state-md-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack