Robertson v. State

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 2026
DocketCAAP-25-0000815
StatusPublished

This text of Robertson v. State (Robertson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson v. State, (hawapp 2026).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-JUN-2026 08:09 AM Dkt. 56 ODSD

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

DEBRA ROBERTSON, Claimant-Appellant-Appellant, v. STATE OF HAWAIʻI, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Employer-Appellee-Appellee, and STATE OF HAWAIʻI, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF HR WORKERS' COMPENSATION UNIT, Insurance Carrier-Appellee-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD (CASE NO. AB 2022-105; DCD NO. 2-04-40090)

ORDER AND ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Gluck, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Agency-Appellee Department of Education, Office of Workers' Compensation Unit Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel (Notice), filed February 19, 2026, by Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey T. Kent (Kent), which the court construes as a motion to withdraw as counsel, under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 50(a), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) Employer/Insurance Carrier/Appellee-Appellee State of Hawaiʻi Department of Education, Office of HR Workers' NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Compensation Unit (DOE) is represented in this appeal by Kent and Deputy Attorney General Amanda L. Donlin (Donlin); (2) The Notice states, pursuant to HRAP Rule 50(b), Kent is withdrawing as counsel of record for DOE and Donlin will continue to represent DOE in this appeal; (3) HRAP Rule 50(b) does not apply here because there is no substitution of counsel. Instead, the court will construe the Notice as a motion to withdraw Kent as counsel for DOE, under HRAP Rule 50(a), and grant the motion; (4) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before December 26, 2025, and January 26, 2026, respectively; (5) Self-represented Claimant/Appellant-Appellant Debra Robertson (Robertson) failed to file either document or request an extension of time; (6) On February 10, 2026, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing Robertson that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on February 20, 2026, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under HRAP Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Robertson could request relief from default by motion; and (7) Robertson has not requested relief from default or an extension of time to file the opening brief. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notice, construed as a motion to withdraw as counsel, is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 29, 2026. /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Daniel M. Gluck Associate Judge 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robertson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-state-hawapp-2026.