Robertson v. State

133 S.E. 284, 35 Ga. App. 395, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 388
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1926·No. 17257·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

The evidence of the accomplice as to the guilt of the accused was direct and positive, and while the evidence of the accomplice must be corroborated, the extent of the corroboration is entirely for the jury. There being some corroborating testimony, this court will not say that the evidence did not authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robertson v. State, 133 S.E. 284, 35 Ga. App. 395, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 388 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

133 S.E. 284 (Robertson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walters v. State
153 S.E. 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)