Robertson v. State

779 So. 2d 661, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3427, 2001 WL 261610
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-2024
StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 661 (Robertson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson v. State, 779 So. 2d 661, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3427, 2001 WL 261610 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has raised an unpreserved sentencing error. We affirm and do not reach the merits because this appeal falls outside the window period provided for in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). See Harvey v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D554, - So.2d -, 2001 WL 137394 (Fla. 1st DCA February 20, 2001); Reese v. State, 763 So.2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

BOOTH, KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reese v. State
763 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Harvey v. State
786 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 661, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3427, 2001 WL 261610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.