Robertson v. Schoonmaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robertson v. Schoonmaker

240 A.D. 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 915 (Robertson v. Schoonmaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Schoonmaker, 240 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order appointing a referee to take testimony and report his findings on the facts to the court on a motion for appointment of a receiver reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for the appointment of a receiver remitted to the Special Term for determination. The malting of the order was improvident. The motion should be decided by the Special Term itself, without any reference respecting it. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order appointing a referee to take testimony and report his findings on the facts to the court on a motion for appointment of a receiver reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for the appointment of a receiver remitted to the Special Term for determination. The malting of the order was improvident. The motion should be decided by the Special Term itself, without any reference respecting it. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-schoonmaker-nyappdiv-1933.