Robertson v. Russell

78 S.E. 682, 13 Ga. App. 27, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 12
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 25, 1913·No. 4823·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pottle, J.

It appears, from ..the answer of the magistrate, that, on account of the inclemency of the weather, the court was moved about forty yards from the usual place for' holding court and in sight of that place. ' The judgment rendered against the plaintiff in certiorari probably was void, as was held by the trial- judge, who sustained the certiorari. Carter v. Atkinson, 12 Ga. App. 390 (77 S. E. 370).- If the- judgment was void, certiorari was not the •remedy. A void 'judgment is no judgment, and may be disregarded and treated as an absolute nullity. - The judge of the superior court should, therefore, have overruled the certiorari,' since it was not available as a remedy to set aside a void judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robertson v. Russell, 78 S.E. 682, 13 Ga. App. 27, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 12 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

78 S.E. 682 (Robertson v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Allen
26 S.E.2d 490 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Brown v. City of Valdosta
172 S.E. 72 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Livsey v. County of Walton
170 S.E. 268 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Griggs v. City of Macon
114 S.E. 899 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Fanning v. Mayor of Washington
86 S.E. 733 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
McDonald v. Farmers Supply Co.
85 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)