Robertson v. Robertson

1 Edw. Ch. 360, 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 212, 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 25
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedJune 11, 1832
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Edw. Ch. 360 (Robertson v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson v. Robertson, 1 Edw. Ch. 360, 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 212, 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 25 (N.Y. 1832).

Opinion

The Více-Chanceelor.

If the order appealed from should be reversed by the Chancellor, still the suit is not at an end. Some responsible person can very likely be procured, or even the present party may be enabled to give security. The pendency of the appeal is therefore not fatal to the hearing of the present motion.

Alimony granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Edw. Ch. 360, 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 212, 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-robertson-nychanct-1832.