ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH, IV
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON, : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 24-cv-0444 : JACQUELYN E. PFURSICH, : Defendant. :
O R D E R AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2024, upon consideration of Aaron Blake Robertson’s pro se Amended Complaint (ECF No. 8), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Amended Complaint is dismissed for the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum as follows: a. The federal access to the courts claim against Jacquelyn E. Pfursich, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B)(ii) as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The dismissal is without prejudice to Robertson filing a new case only in the event his underlying conviction is reversed, vacated, or otherwise invalidated. b. All state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr. JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH, IV (ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH, IV) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.