Robertson v. Nowalsky

169 So. 2d 227, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 2075
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 2, 1964
DocketNo. 1708
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 169 So. 2d 227 (Robertson v. Nowalsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson v. Nowalsky, 169 So. 2d 227, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 2075 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

CHRIS T. BARNETTE, Judge pro tem.

From a judgment maintaining an exception of no right or cause of action and dismissing plaintiff’s demands, a devolutive appeal was taken returnable to this Court on August 7, 1964. On that date the trial court issued an order extending the return date to October S, 1964.

The record was not transmitted and lodged in this Court on or before October 5 by the clerk of the court below, as required by LSA-C.C.P. art. 2127, on account of the failure of the appellant to make timely payment of all fees and costs due in connection with the appeal. Whereupon the appellee caused the record to be brought up and filed in this Court to lay the basis for a motion for dismissal of the appeal.

The record before us discloses the facts to be as represented. We find the clerk of the court below to have acted according to law in not transmitting the record on account of failure of appellant to make timely payment of the fees in connection with the appeal as required by LSA-C.C.P. art. 2127.

The motion is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Lasseigne
232 So. 2d 278 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1970)
McIntosh v. City of New Orleans, Department of Regulatory Inspection
188 So. 2d 183 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 So. 2d 227, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 2075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-nowalsky-lactapp-1964.