Robertson v. Lucas

9 Mart. 187
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Mart. 187 (Robertson v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson v. Lucas, 9 Mart. 187 (La. 1822).

Opinion

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. On the trial of this cause, the judge a quo being of opinion that the plaintiff had not made out his case, informed the defendant’s counsel, that it was not necessary for him to introduce any evidence, and judgment accordingly in his favor. We think, from an examination of the testimony, that justice cannot be done, without having this evidence before us. The cause must therefore be remanded for a new trial. [188]*188It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be annulled, avoided and reversed, that this cause be remanded to be tried anew, and that the appellee pay the costs of this appeal.

East’n District. March, 1822. Ripley for the plaintiff, M1 Caleb for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Mart. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-lucas-la-1822.