Robertson v. Jewelers Publishing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robertson v. Jewelers Publishing Corp.

234 A.D. 884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 884 (Robertson v. Jewelers Publishing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Jewelers Publishing Corp., 234 A.D. 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order on reargument reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion to restore the action granted, with ten dollars costs, and the action restored to the day trial calendar of the court for a trial of all the issues before the court and a jury. It is conceded by counsel for both parties that there are few material controverted facts. The issues involved, therefore, are largely questions of law. If the contract relied upon by the plaintiff be established, the computation of the amount due does not involve the examination of a long account. If it appear upon the trial that a long and complicated account is involved, making determination thereof by a jury difficult, it will then be the proper time to apply for a reference. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order on reargument reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion to restore the action granted, with ten dollars costs, and the action restored to the day trial calendar of the court for a trial of all the issues before the court and a jury. It is conceded by counsel for both parties that there are few material controverted facts. The issues involved, therefore, are largely questions of law. If the contract relied upon by the plaintiff be established, the computation of the amount due does not involve the examination of a long account. If it appear upon the trial that a long and complicated account is involved, making determination thereof by a jury difficult, it will then be the proper time to apply for a reference. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-jewelers-publishing-corp-nyappdiv-1931.