Robertson v. Heights Flint Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Robertson v. Heights Flint Co.

127 Misc. 43, 215 N.Y.S. 264, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 912

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 127 Misc. 43 (Robertson v. Heights Flint Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Heights Flint Co., 127 Misc. 43, 215 N.Y.S. 264, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The individual defendant having acted as agent of the corporate defendant, and the moneys paid having been placed in the custody of that defendant, in accordance with the terms of the contract, no cause of action was made out against the defendant Seiff.

The fact that the corporate seller of the machine was dissolved and its selling agency canceled prior to the ultimate date, May 1, 1925, when plaintiff could have demanded delivery of the car which he had purchased from the corporation in November, 1924, did not as matter of law prevent delivery of the car in accordance with [44]*44plaintiff’s contract, and the evidence does not establish a breach of the contract by the seller.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits as against both defendants, with costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Ltdon and Levy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The individual defendant having acted as agent of the corporate defendant, and the moneys paid having been placed in the custody of that defendant, in accordance with the terms of the contract, no cause of action was made out against the defendant Seiff.

The fact that the corporate seller of the machine was dissolved and its selling agency canceled prior to the ultimate date, May 1, 1925, when plaintiff could have demanded delivery of the car which he had purchased from the corporation in November, 1924, did not as matter of law prevent delivery of the car in accordance with [44]*44plaintiff’s contract, and the evidence does not establish a breach of the contract by the seller.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits as against both defendants, with costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Ltdon and Levy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 Misc. 43, 215 N.Y.S. 264, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-heights-flint-co-nyappterm-1926.