Robertson v. Hagood Homes, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJune 4, 2002
DocketI.C. NO. 987932
StatusPublished

This text of Robertson v. Hagood Homes, Inc. (Robertson v. Hagood Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson v. Hagood Homes, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner W. Bain Jones, Jr. and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner W. Bain Jones, Jr. with modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing and in a Pre-Trial Agreement as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The date of the alleged injury was October 26, 1999.

2. Villanova Insurance Company was the carrier on risk for Hagood Homes, Inc.

3. Jim McGirt was non-insured at the date of the alleged injury.

4. Eric Schuette d/b/a Precision Home Builders was non-insured on the date of the alleged injury.

5. Cape Fear Hospital Emergency Room records from October 26, 1999 were stipulated into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 1.

6. Medical Records from David A. Esposito, M.D., consisting of five (5) pages were stipulated into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 2.

7. The issues before the Deputy Commissioner were: (i) did the employer-employee relationship exist between plaintiff and defendant Jim McGirt; (ii) did plaintiff sustain an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant Jim McGirt; (iii) if so, who is liable for any medical indemnity compensation due plaintiff?

***********
Based upon all the competent evidence of record, the Full, Commission makes the following additional:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was an employee of Jim McGirt on October 26, 1999. Although plaintiff and McGirt had worked together on other jobs in the past as friends, with regard to their relationship in October 1999, the evidence establishes that McGirt hired plaintiff to work as a framer helper earning $12.00 an hour. McGirt had 3 or more employees and was subject to the North Carolina Workers Compensation Act. McGirt retained the right to fire plaintiff, and plaintiff was not free to hire a helper. McGirt furnished the tools and materials for the job, and Jimmy Collins, who was also employed by McGirt, directed plaintiff in his work.

2. On October 26, 1999, while working as a framer helper for McGirt, plaintiff fell six feet from a ladder, sustaining a concussion and a nondisplaced intra-articular right distal radial fracture. Following the injury, plaintiff, who is right hand dominant, came under the care of Dr. Esposito and was totally disabled for a period of approximately ten weeks. During that time, plaintiff did pick up some odd jobs and was able to earn $1,600.00. In January of 2000, Dr. Esposito recommended an MRI, but plaintiff was unable to pursue further treatment with no income or insurance to cover it.

3. Plaintiff has an unpaid balance with Dr. Esposito of $1,893.50, and $1,578.46 with the hospital. In January of 2000, plaintiff returned to work for another employer as a driver, earning an average weekly wage of approximately $325.00. Plaintiff has never been able to complete his treatment, and has not been evaluated for a permanent disability rating.

4. Defendant Hagood Homes was the general contractor on the house at which plaintiff was working on October 26, 1999. Hagood Homes had subcontracted the house out to Eric Schuette, d/b/a Precision Home Builders. Schuette, in turn, subcontracted out the framing to McGirt.

5. When Schuette and McGirt first discussed the contract in October 1999, Schuette told McGirt that he was going to hold back $1,000.00 from the contract price to provide workers' compensation coverage for McGirt's employees. Plaintiff was told that he was going to be covered by Schuette's workers' compensation policy. In fact, at the time Schuette negotiated this deal with McGirt, Schuette knew that his workers' compensation policy had already been canceled back in September of 1999. When McGirt and his employees began working on the job, Schuette warned them to be careful because he was having "problems" with his insurance, but Schuette never told anyone that his workers' compensation insurance had been canceled, until after plaintiff was injured. And even though his workers' compensation insurance had been canceled, Schuette still withheld $1,000.00 at the end of the contract.

6. Schuette and Hagood Home began working together in March of 1999. At that time, Schuette and Jim Kenny, president of Hagood Homes, entered into a verbal contract for Schuette to frame a house on Lot 15 in the Magnolia Green subdivision. That was the only house contracted for at that time. Kenny told Schuette that he needed to provide a certificate of insurance if he wanted the job. Schuette went to the Heinberg Insurance Agency and secured through them workers' compensation coverage with Harbor Specialty. At Schuette's request, Heinberg prepared a certificate of insurance for Schuette and it was faxed to Jim Kenny at Hagood Homes. The certificate, provided in discovery, had a notation at the bottom that it was for Lot 15 Magnolia Green, and that the policy was to be effective for the period from March 16, 1999 to March 16, 2000.

7. Schuette completed the house on Lot 15, and then over the next six months entered into separate verbal contracts with Jim Kenny to do four more houses. Each house was a new verbal contract. The evidence is uncontradicted that Jim Kenny did not request a new certificate of insurance at the time each new contract was entered into with Schuette. Had Kenny asked for a certificate of insurance at the time the contract on the house plaintiff was injured at was sublet, Schuette would not have been able to provide one, because his insurance had been canceled. When Kenny discovered that Schuette was, in fact, non-insured on the date plaintiff was injured, he asked McGirt and Schuette to get plaintiff to sign a release. McGirt and Schuette made payments to plaintiff totaling $600.00, even though plaintiff would not sign the release.

8. Schuette's workers' compensation policy was in effect from May 16, 1999 until September 25, 1999. This policy with Harbor Specialty Insurance Company was terminated because the premiums were not paid.

9. It is more likely than not that Hagood Homes was notified by Bill Heinburg Insurance that Schuette's insurance had been canceled based upon the notice of cancellation that states:

Should any of the above described polices be canceled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail ____ days written notice to the certificate holder named to the left, but failure to do so shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the insurer, its agents or representatives.

10. At the time of plaintiff's injury by accident, Jim McGirt became aware that Eric Schuette d/b/a Precision Home Builders had no workers' compensation coverage.

11. Jim McGirt and Eric Schuette assured plaintiff that his medical bills would be paid and that he would receive compensation during the time he was convalescing from his injuries.

12. Plaintiff received $300.00 from Eric Schuette during the time he was out of work and $200.00 from Jim McGirt as well as a car valued at $300.00.

13. Plaintiff has outstanding bills for medical treatment and/or prescriptions.

14. Jim Kenny was aware that plaintiff had been injured on the job. Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-19
North Carolina § 97-19
§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-30
North Carolina § 97-30
§ 97-42
North Carolina § 97-42
§ 97-88
North Carolina § 97-88
§ 97-93
North Carolina § 97-93
§ 97-94
North Carolina § 97-94

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robertson v. Hagood Homes, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-hagood-homes-inc-ncworkcompcom-2002.