Robertson v. Franchot
This text of 334 F. App'x 565 (Robertson v. Franchot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[566]*566Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.
Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s marginal order, entered on April 24, 2009, denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find the district did not abuse its discretion in denying Robertson’s motion to reconsider. See Boryan v. United States, 884 F.2d 767, 771 (4th Cir.1989) (providing review standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F. App'x 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-franchot-ca4-2009.