Robertson v. Flowers Baking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC

Fourth Circuit

Robertson v. Flowers Baking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC

474 F. App'x 242

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2012·No. No. 12-1520·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Lee Robertson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. Flowers Baking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC, No. 6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC, 2012 WL 830097 (W.D.Va. Mar. 6, 2012) & (Apr. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Lee Robertson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. Flowers Baking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC, No. 6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC, 2012 WL 830097 (W.D.Va. Mar. 6, 2012) & (Apr. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Robertson v. Flowers Baking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC, 474 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 242 (Robertson v. Flowers Baking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.