Robertson v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Robertson v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc.

385 So. 2d 138, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16442

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 18, 1980

DocketNo. 80-403

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 385 So. 2d 138 (Robertson v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc., 385 So. 2d 138, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16442 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

SHARP, Judge.

The plaintiff, Frances L. Robertson, appeals the final judgment of the trial court dismissing those counts of the complaint which sought to establish punitive damages against the defendant. Still remaining for trial are counts relating to compensatory damages. The defendants move to dismiss the appeal because the judgment is not a final order reviewable under Rule 9.030(b)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We agree and accordingly dismiss this appeal.

This court lacks jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless the order sought to be appealed falls within one of the categories listed in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3). Denial of punitive damages prior to trial of the compensatory damage counts is not an appeala-ble interlocutory matter under this Rule.

The plaintiff relies upon Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Inc., 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974). The Florida Supreme Court held that the trial court’s granting of a final summary judgment against the plaintiff on counts alleging fraud was ap-pealable as a “final order” even though left for trial were counts relating to a breach of contract. The court noted its policy against “piece-meal appeals” but allowed the appeal in this instance because the fraud and contract claims were separate and distinct causes of action. In this case the claim for compensatory and punitive damages are legally interrelated and involve the same transaction. An action for punitive damages cannot be maintained independently of an action for compensatory damages. American Motorcycle Institute, Inc. v. Mitchell, 380 So.2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). We do not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Kingsland v. National Advertising Co., 384 So.2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

DISMISSED.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

SHARP, Judge.

The plaintiff, Frances L. Robertson, appeals the final judgment of the trial court dismissing those counts of the complaint which sought to establish punitive damages against the defendant. Still remaining for trial are counts relating to compensatory damages. The defendants move to dismiss the appeal because the judgment is not a final order reviewable under Rule 9.030(b)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We agree and accordingly dismiss this appeal.

This court lacks jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless the order sought to be appealed falls within one of the categories listed in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3). Denial of punitive damages prior to trial of the compensatory damage counts is not an appeala-ble interlocutory matter under this Rule.

The plaintiff relies upon Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Inc., 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974). The Florida Supreme Court held that the trial court’s granting of a final summary judgment against the plaintiff on counts alleging fraud was ap-pealable as a “final order” even though left for trial were counts relating to a breach of contract. The court noted its policy against “piece-meal appeals” but allowed the appeal in this instance because the fraud and contract claims were separate and distinct causes of action. In this case the claim for compensatory and punitive damages are legally interrelated and involve the same transaction. An action for punitive damages cannot be maintained independently of an action for compensatory damages. American Motorcycle Institute, Inc. v. Mitchell, 380 So.2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). We do not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Kingsland v. National Advertising Co., 384 So.2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

DISMISSED.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 So. 2d 138, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-florida-rock-tank-lines-inc-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack